Sunday, September 22, 2019

Are we Becoming Less Compassionate, Less Fully Human?


Love and compassion are necessities, not luxuries. Without them humanity cannot survive” - Dalai Lama.
Love behaves like a separate being in the psyche, acting from within and enabling us to look beyond ourselves at our fellow human beings – people who can be valued and cherished, rather than used” - Robert Johnson, Psychologist
“Fundamentally being compassionate or caring for others is actually our default mode and that often times especially in modern society, we get distracted from who we really are” – Dr James Doty, Professor of Neurosurgery

“What are we if we don’t try to help others? We’re nothing. Nothing at all” – Henry Marsh, Brain surgeon

We have come a long way in the last 600 million years!

Humanity 1.01 in a nutshell:
“It is possible that the first creatures with a nervous system were entirely unconscious. Still, over 600 million years, the simple network linking sensory and motor systems grew more complex, and developed a headquarters – a rudimentary brain – at the top of the spinal cord. This brain evolved further from the bottom up, first thickening the brainstem, next acquiring subcortical structures such as the amygdala and basal ganglia, and then growing a cortex that now includes the prefrontal, parietal, temporal, and occipital lobes. Somewhere along the way, the survival of animals was increased by evolving capacities to become aware of their internal states and external environment. Perhaps the ancient jellyfish had no awareness, but the goldfish in a pond are clearly aware of the gardener’s shadow as they rise to be fed, and a cat shows heightened awareness of a nearby dog. In humans and other animals, awareness, attention, sleep, and waking all depend upon underlying neural structures and activities; consciousness is largely if not entirely a natural process.  (Panksepp 2005).

Rick Hansen continues the story: “Love is woven into your day because it's woven into your DNA: as our ancestors evolved over the last several million years, many scientists believe that love, broadly defined, has been the primary driving force behind the evolution of the brain. Bands of early humans that were particularly good at understanding and caring for each other out-competed less cooperative and loving bands, and thereby passed on the genes of empathy, bonding, friendship, altruism, romance, compassion, and kindness - the genes, in a word, of love”. (Hansen, Rick. 2013)

Aborigine elder Bob Randall explains that, “Kanyini is the principle of connectedness through caring and responsibility that underpins Aboriginal life … ​Only we can be responsible for our kurunpa, our soul.  It is affected by our thoughts and actions. If it is weakened for example because we have ignored our responsibility towards a family member in need, then that will affect us physically. We feel a sickness of spirit. All this comes from tjukurrpa, which is the bigger consciousness of something that was and is the way to live, the way to live in harmony with all things”. (Hogan, M & Randall, R. 2006)


But have we started going backwards in the last few years?

Mahatma Gandhi is reported to have said, “You must not lose faith in humanity. Humanity is an ocean; if a few drops of the ocean are dirty, the ocean does not become dirty”. Does that still hold? What are the things that threaten our feeling and demonstration of compassion?

My ‘market research of one’ tells me that more and more people are being caught up in the ‘me first, look after number one’ mind-set. They are joining the stampede to build their personal brand, make money, often in abrasive, bitter, angry, sometimes outrageous ways – and this drive is fuelled by populist politicians and on social media. We are bombarded with fake news, by denials, naming and blaming, fear mongering, stereotyping, ‘us and them’ thinking. This amounts to an assault on our basic impulse to be empathic.  (In South Africa, when farmers and foreign nationals are murdered, looted and attacked and when femicide assumes epidemic proportions, when leadership remains corrupt, fuels aggressive and violent behaviour or remains silent on critical issues, we may well ask, ‘Where has compassion and respect for the dignity of the other gone?’)
It may be that the demands of the Fourth Industrial Revolution, the super-fast, complex, high-tech and uncertain transformation of society that is upon us, will exacerbate the trend towards reduced compassion. It may also be that diminishing resources (water, food, clean air) will put more focus on survival and ‘us versus them’ conflict, and void engagement with emotions and virtues like compassion. Will we see a greater emergence of the bystander effect, a crossing to the other side of the street when confronted by someone else in distress?  Will the new meaning of ‘friend’ shift from social media to ‘real life’? (Has compassion become for many an emoji with a sad face or tears?)   Is more disconnection occurring? Are potential macro events likely to even further erode human compassion (Is a break-up of the United Nations such a far-fetched thought? Will trade and other wars escalate and effectively separate peoples?
Is compassion being watered down by corporates claiming moral high ground for selfish motive - under the guise of an espoused virtue. A response to a LinkedIn post caught my eye recently: The other function of this virtue signalling sinecure is the cynical use of conspicuous compassion”. (The Guardian. 2019)

Sara Konrath is Assistant Research Professor at the Research Center for Group Dynamics at the University of Michigan. With a primary focus on the costs and benefits of empathy and related traits (e.g. emotional intelligence, narcissism) and behaviors (e.g. helping, caregiving).  Her studies indicate that we may be becoming less considerate, less inclined to be empathic, and less likely to relate to other’s feelings and viewpoints. “While this rate of decline appeared to be relatively stable between 1979 and 1999, it nearly tripled after the year 2000”. (Weikle, B)

What about the (distant?) possibilities (helpful or harmful) of communicating telepathically,
thanks to brain-computer interfaces …. that’s the gist of a new report about neural implant technology by the Royal Society, a UK scientific organization … ‘Not only thoughts, but sensory experiences, could be communicated from brain to brain,’ the report reads. ‘Someone on holiday could beam a ‘neural postcard’ of what they are seeing, hearing or tasting into the mind of a friend back home’. (Robitski, D. 2019)
A vehicle for scientific telepathic compassion! (Certainly, the case for an influential body to work effectively and urgently in the ethics-in-artificial-intelligence arena is becoming stronger by the day)

Can we reclaim our essential humanity and compassion?

It is not a question of whether we can reclaim, rather that we must reclaim compassion.
Instigated by author Karen Armstrong, an expert on comparative religion, and unveiled in 2009, the Charter for Compassion exhorts all peoples and religions to embrace the core virtue of compassion. It recognises that “We urgently need to make compassion a clear, luminous and dynamic force in our polarized world … Born of our deep interdependence, compassion is essential to human relationships and to a fulfilled humanity”. (Charter of Compassion. 2009).


We are whole persons (physical, intellectual, emotional, social and spiritual) and being fully human means not denying any part of ourselves. Compassion is a ‘spiritual’ (not religious) virtue. It is most often accompanied by empathy, unconditional love and a desire to come alongside, support, sooth and comfort another being who is experiencing pain or suffering (or self for that matter). It is not something that can be taught intellectually. Rather it is a matter of the heart, learned as we are exposed to parenting, conditioning and experiences; and it results or issues from what Leonard Cohen termed “a revelation of the heart”. Maria Popova relates a wonderful example of this from Mark Twain’s life. (Popova, M. 2014)
In ‘slow motion’ we can trace a progression from indifference to sympathy/pity to empathy to compassion to an ethical action of love. See it happening in this story:

In 1944 the mother of the poet Yevtushenko travelled from Siberia to Moscow, where she witnessed a procession of 20, 000 German prisoners of war marching through the streets. The generals strutted at their head, oozing contempt, determined to show that they still considered themselves superior. “The bastards smell of perfume’, someone shouted. The crowd yelled its hatred. The women waved their clenched fists in anger, and the police had great difficulty in holding them back. But when the Russians saw how pitifully thin and ragged the ordinary German soldiers were, dirty, battered and completely miserable, many of them hobbling on crutches, the street became silent. Suddenly, an elderly woman broke through the cordon and held out a crust of bread to one of the soldiers. Then from every side, other woman copied her, giving food, cigarettes, whatever they had with them. ‘The soldiers were no longer enemies. They were people”’.

So, how do we nurture soft hearts?

RAISE YOUR AWARENESS
The essence of Prayer is attention, and the essence of Compassion is attention – thus compassion is a form of prayer. This fits with an overall awareness that we are all a part of the web of life, totally and deeply interconnected.  Naturally mindful Zorba the Greek said it well: 

“It’s beyond me. Everything seems to have a soul – wood, stones, the wine we drink and the earth we tread on. Everything, boss, absolutely everything!” (Kazantzakis, N. 1961)

We can be thus aware during even the busiest of days. And mindfulness does have power to foster self and other compassion, entrench beliefs and thought processes, help the embodiment and ‘hard-wiring’ of a compassionate mind-set; which reinforces ‘just doing it’.

Emotional intelligence and the ability to understand and relate to self and others rests on developing awareness.

DO INNER WORK
Jung’s idea of individuation (becoming whole) is not individualisation, which begets loneliness and depression through disconnection. It is about brave adherence to inner work to discover and work with those parts of ourselves we subdue, hide (‘good’ and ‘bad’). So that we can overcome negative power in the form of fears, biases; and release a latent, inherent acceptance, love and compassion – for self and for others – letting go of existing protective mechanisms, limiting beliefs, biases, anything that holds us back or weighs us down - in order to adapt and develop - without fear of backlash or adverse consequence. And become integrated, authentic, real – present rather than egoic.  

I want to emphasize that the shadow is not inherently evil or wrong; it varies from culture to culture. In the United States today, white dominant culture prizes competition, urgency, individualism, niceness (or avoidance of conflict), and logic. Other values and ways of being, such as cooperation, appropriate self-care, community, and vulnerability, are often seen as inferior. We cause so much harm and lose so much possibility by fearing our differences. By reclaiming our shadow we can tap into greater compassion and creativity”. (Rohr, R. 2019) 

Without inner work, and owning our shadow side, we are nothing.

Meditation, reflection, journaling are practices that we might employ. Specifically, with respect to compassion, Japanese naikan reflection is helpful.
When mulling over relationship difficulties, events that have caused distance and friction, the Jewish practice of midrash can be effectively utilised to encourage reframing, active imagination, and plumbing of the depths of each story and uncover new truth and possibility, explore numerous facets of the same story from different angles and viewpoints. (McKenna, M and Cowan, T. 1997)
McKenna, Megan and Cowan, Tony (1997) Keepers of the Story Orbis Books, pg 66.

RECOGNISE THAT COMPASSION HAS A GROUP AND SHARED DYNAMIC
Of course, developing compassion for self (leading to compassion for other) has undeniable value. (Germer, C & Neff, K. 2019). We should also recognise that separation, non-connection can foster distrust, verbal and even physical violence. In the same way that crowds, organisations, groups can lead to a fragmentation of conscience, breakdown of ethical behaviour – so they can influence and facilitate positive, virtuous behaviour and thinking.  Revisit the Yevtushenko story above.
Compassion doesn't belong to the individual, it is an emergent property of the whole".  Compassion is not an individual, superior, ‘helping’, self-serving attribute or property, but equalises us. It can be seen as a non-dualistic dynamic shared between ‘giver’ and ‘receiver’. Cynthia Bourgeault refers to this as “effortless compassion”.  (Bourgeault, C. 2017)

Watch this wonderful, wise, and humble explanation: https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=7&v=dl8qaVRiK5U


And if we can learn to be open to receiving compassion from others when in pain, we are simultaneously equipping ourselves to extend compassion towards ourselves and others.

JUST DO IT
Practice precedes competence. Behaviour can beget attitude. Doing assists being. Rachel Naomi Remen, a medical doctor with a chronic illness who understands patients, can put herself in their shoes:

"Before every session I take a moment to remember my humanity. There is no experience that this man has that I cannot share with him, no fear I cannot understand, no suffering that I cannot care about, because I too am human. No matter how deep his wound, he does not need to be ashamed in front of me. I too am vulnerable. And because of this, I am enough. Whatever his story, he no longer needs to be alone with it. This is what will allow his healing to begin". (Remen, R. 1996)

Spiritual Care teacher Kirsten DeLeo on coming alongside another:  

“Accompaniment is a beautiful word and not much used these days. It speaks directly to what we do when we care for someone nearing the end of life. The Greek word for comforter is paraclete, which means “the one who walks alongside”. Caring for another means we accompany them, we walk by their side. Walking alongside the dying on their journey, we are fully present for them and also fully present to ourselves”. Her wisdom applies in any context, not only the dying process. (DeLeo, K. 2015)

In our day-to-day interactions, mindful listening is a powerful combination of unfiltered, focused, unconditional-acceptance based on valuing the other. A compassionate practice.
Just-do- it presupposes that continual learning and growth allow one over time to just-do-it-better!  
So for example, when anger is triggered, we can more naturally bring into play:

·         Emotional intelligence to identify and accept it
·         Realise as a fruit of inner work that strong emotional reactions are often prompted by our own shadow
·         Put oneself in the other person’s shoes
·         Shift our emotional focus away from any person involved (and putting the focus of our moral outrage/ righteous anger on the issue)
·         Apply nonviolent communication when we engage (focusing on both parties needs and requests) and not lapsing into naming and blaming or intellectual debating of the issue. This is in recognition that we are all part of the web of life, connected at a deep level and that we simply do not know the other’s soul intentions and needs
·         Uncover through naikan reflection that we all invoke anger in others

… and thus bring about a transformation of the anger (or despair, pain, frustration …..) into compassion

A CAUTIONARY WORD OR THREE
Neuroscience and positive psychology offer much. Practitioners sometimes have a tendency to reduce ‘heart’ matters to formulae and use these to promote individual ‘growth’ based on dubious motives. ‘Science’ is sometimes highly specialised and ‘narrow’, and not always holistic and unbiased.
Take kissing, reduced to chemical and ‘scientific’ analysis:

Evolutionary biologists suggest that erotic kissing is a so-called relic gesture, passed down through cultures from these early practices of the mother’s deep kissing and the infant’s searching tongue movements. What happens to our hormones when we kiss?
Anthropologist, Helen Fisher says that when we partake in mouth-to-mouth kissing, we share saliva which has testosterone in it which enhances our sex-drive. Kissing also stimulates the brain hormones, dopamine and oxytocin– both of which promote bonding and attachment in human beings”. (Thompson, S. 2018) 

In similar fashion, compassion may be reduced to the formulaic:
Empathy + Benevolence + Urge to Act = Compassion
Of course it is interesting (and maybe impressive)  to note that when compassion is being demonstrated our vagus nerve comes into play, the heart rate increases, certain regions of the brain are activated, and oxytocin is released …. But none of that adds to or reduces our capacity for compassion.

And Eastern and Ancient practices are sometimes hijacked and commoditised (deliberately or unwittingly) to serve Western outcomes and lucrative markets.  Think about Purpose (Williams, G. 2016), Meaningful engagement, Mindfulness, …

Prof of Management Ronald: “As mindfulness has increasingly pervaded every aspect of contemporary society, so have misunderstandings about what it is, whom it helps, and how it affects the mind and brain. At a practical level, the misinformation and propagation of poor research methodology can potentially lead to people being harmed, cheated disappointed, and/or disaffected”. (Purser, R.E. 2019)   Fr John Maine: “Learning to meditate is not just a matter of mastering a technique. It is much more learning to appreciate and respond directly to the depths of your own nature, not human nature in general, but your own in particular”. (Main, J.) Meditation is more about subduing the ego in stillness and silence, than about developing achievement skills!

Perhaps we can recover our humanity and innate compassion best by relying more on nurturing our heart-minds? (Tafler, A. 2019)

Contemplate Vincent Willem van Gogh’s The Good Samaritan (In the Public Domain)


References

Bourgeault, Cynthia (2017)  The Heart of Compassion  2017 Festival of Faiths https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=7&v=dl8qaVRiK5U

Buscaglia  Leo (1972) Love: what life is all about Fawcett Columbine

Charter for Compassion (2009)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charter_for_Compassion


DeLeo, Kirsten (2015) The Bone at the Heart: Care for the Dying - the Contemplative Approach Wise Brain Bulletin Issue 9.2  April 2015


Germer, Christopher & Neff, Kristin (2019) Teaching the Mindful Self-Compassion Program: A Guide for Professionals 1st Edition, The Guilford Press

Hansen, Rick (2013) Trust in Love  Just One Thing Newsletter, 17 July

Hogan, Melanie and Randall, Bob (Producers) (2006) Kanyini (Film)

Kazantzakis, Nikos (1995) Zorba the Greek Faber & Faber

Main, John, Fr   John Main and the Practice of Christian Meditation

McKenna, Megan and Cowan, Tony (1997) Keepers of the Story Orbis Books, pg 66.

Panksepp, Jaak (2005) Affective Consciousness: Core Emotional Feelings in Animals and Humans Consciousness & Cognition 14, no. 1 (2005): 30–80. Cited in Neurodharma: Practicing with the 
Brain in Mind   © 2013 Rick Hanson, Ph.D.

Popova, Maria (2014) Brain Pickings: Mark Twain on Racism, how Religion is Used to Justify Injustics, and What His Mother Taught Him About Compassion 24th October, 2014; citing The Biography of Mark twain

Purser, Ronald (2019) McMindfulness: How Mindfulness Became the New Capitalist Spirituality   Repeater Books, UK 

Remen, Rachel Naomi MD  (1996) Kitchen Table Wisdom The Berkley Publishing Group (Penguin)

Robitski, Dan (2019) Scientists: Brain Implants Could Essentially Make Us Telepathic  Futurism 10th September, 2019

Rohr, Richard (2019) The Universal Christ: how a forgotten reality can change everything we see, hope for and believe SPCK & Convergent Books
Rohr, Richard (2019) Meditation: Nodding to the Shadow Center for Action and Contemplation 11th September, 20129

Tafler, Afshan (2019) How Your Heart May Be Your Wisest Brain  Unyte Health Inc. Blog

The Guardian (2019)  Australians reject Coalition attacks on businesses promoting social issues: New survey finds almost 80% support CEOs having a say, but more than half believe when they do, it is out of self-interest   16th September, 2019 

(Owen E. comment on LinkedIn post by Graham Allsopp on 16th September, 2019)

See also: https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2019/sep/16/most-australians-believe-business-leaders-should-speak-out-on-social-issues

Thompson, Sylvia (2018) Science of kissing: why a kiss is not just a kiss. The evolutionary origins and physiology behind mouth to mouth kissing   Irish Times Tue, Feb 13, 2018, 07:01


Tyson,  Neil DeGrasse (2014) Explains Why The Cosmos Shouldn't Make You Feel Small (interview with WBUR News/NPR) February 27, 2014 https://www.wbur.org/npr/283443670/neil-degrasse-tyson-explains-why-the-cosmos-shouldnt-make-you-feel-small 


Weikle, Brandie How to cultivate compassion  Reader’s Digest


Williams, Graham (2016) Corporate Stampede to Purpose

Zeldin, Theodore (1998) An Intimate History of Humanity   Vintage



INFORMAL COLLABORATIVE ENGAGEMENT: USING SOCIAL CONTRACTS TO MAKE WORK RELATIONSHIPS WORK BETTER


                       The Peacemaker (detail), Ernest L. Blumenschein, 1913, courtesy of the Anschutz Collection.



A contract isn’t about saying what you meant. It is meaning what you say” - Oliver Wendell Holmes, 19th century physician and poet
Change is a door that can only be opened from the inside” - French proverb


Threatened Relationships 

The hectic, strident and demanding world that we live in, accompanied by inadequate and often indirect communication (fake news, rushed meetings, cryptic social media exchanges …) can challenge our communication and relating efforts in society, at home and at work.

Aggressive, verbally-violent talk also seems to be becoming more acceptable in some cultures (Not only directly but also in email exchanges, on social media …). Australian cricketers are known for their practice of aggressively “sledging” (badgering, chirping, insulting) opponents as an act of ‘gamesmanship’ to gain an advantage. English parliamentarians are usually less brash, and adopt (less subtle?) sarcasm, belittling, and innuendo to put down their debate opponents. American and South African politicians set an example of downright rude, divisive, hate-filled speech. The list goes on. What is happening to civility? Does one merely keep quiet? What are the consequences of speaking out against such disgusting behaviour?

In workplaces this communication challenge can be exacerbated when people don’t feel psychologically safe enough to speak out on certain issues or within certain relationships, and when necessary and well-intended organisational rules, formal agreements, roles, responsibilities and processes further impede natural, transparent communication.

This week, in conversation with a South African university department head who is involved with a student exchange programme with an Oslo university, reported Black students complaining bitterly that their Norwegian hosts didn’t understand them, didn’t make enough effort to help them fit in. The Norwegians on their side were also struggling to understand the discontent from people receiving free hospitality, accommodation, board and lodging and education. Clearly expectations, communication of needs and requests from both sides are simply not happening.

Clearly similar situations in the workplace can impact performance and productivity, even result in conflict, and this creates a need for us to find a way that is above and beyond. 

An Informal, Collaborative Engagement

Here is a simple workplace mechanism that I designed many years ago and which works so well that I advocate its use whenever feasible and desirable.

Two work members who interact fairly often, or only occasionally but on matters of importance, who may be from different units or departments, and may be at different levels in the organisation, get together to improve their working relationship. Prior to meeting for their conversation they each fill in the document below, and the objective of the conversation (or conversations, if necessary) is to arrive at a jointly agreed document.



So I Graham, may convey to Eva these requests:

TASK EXAMPLE: “When we do stocktaking, I need you to arrive at the appointed time and not try to rush through the exercise”. 
RELATIONSHIP
EXAMPLE:           “(I sometimes struggle with looking up product codes), and need you to be
                                understanding and patient”.
Each item (task and relationship) that is raised, is discussed, altered if agreed, or excluded/ postponed because it is “not yet agreed”. 

The conversation:
·         may be instigated by either party.
·         is voluntary. A free choice.
·         Is direct, face to face
·         is more about hearts than minds
·         is held between equals, irrespective of any formal difference in level or position in the organisation
·         occurs as a nonviolent communication, where the parties are respectful, mindful and tuned in to the other
·         is confidential unless both parties agree to it being shared with anyone else
·         takes place in a psychologically safe space
·         often reveals to the parties that which they previously did not know about the other, and themselves – and is a growth opportunity

It usually works best when the participants contain their needs and requests to what really matters. Longer lists don’t result in better outcomes.

Progress against the collaboration as captured in the jointly agreed document is followed up at a time scheduled by the parties involved. They may also agree to instigate further impromptu communication should the need arise.


Background Explanation/ The Logic Behind the Informal, Collaborative Engagement Mechanism

A psychologically safe space experienced in those workplaces that employees feel are caring, fair and reliable; where they know that they are appreciated, belong and are free to fully express themselves, to safely engage and contribute their views and concerns without any fear of adverse consequences or of being ignored. A fuller coverage of this topic will appear in the September 2019  issue of Human Capital Review. (Williams, G & Kennedy, J. 2019)

Nonviolent conversation is characterised by a focus NOT on issues or problems, but on the joint consideration of needs and requests. It requires patient listening, and empathic understanding.
“Habits of thinking and speaking leading to the use of violence (social, psychological and physical) are learned through culture. NVC (Nonviolent Communication) theory supposes all human behavior stems from attempts to meet universal human needs. The needs are never in conflict. Rather, conflict arises when strategies for meeting needs clash. NVC proposes people identify shared needs, revealed by the thoughts and feelings surrounding these needs, and collaborate to develop strategies and make requests of each other to meet each other's needs”.
Rosenberg invites NVC practitioners to focus attention on these components:
·          what we are actually seeing, hearing, or touching – not interpreted, filtered, evaluated
·         hearing and sharing feelings that reflect vulnerabilities and needs
·         clear, simple requests for a specific positive action, free of demand and accepting of a ‘no’ that then gives rise to further, later conversation.
(Rosenberg, M.B. 2003)

Terry Real’s Relationship Grid for couples has application in all one on one relationships. It resonates with a number of other assertive relating and communicating behaviour models. In the diagram below a healthy balance is at the centre, and the extremes are at the ends of the self-esteem and boundaries axes. The self-esteem axis runs from inferior to superior, and psychological boundaries run from thin-skinned/ over-sensitive/ connected but not protected, to thick-skinned/ protected not connected. The four quadrants for both participants to stay out of, are:
Superior/ No Boundaries.       Bossy, abusive, entitled
Inferior. No Boundaries.         Play the victim, “Please love me”
Superior/ Thick-skinned.         “You’re not up to my standard and I feel contempt for you”.
Inferior/ Thick – skinned.        Disengaged. Given up.
(Real, T. 2015)




Daniel Siegel’s “research work has demonstrated that mindful practices have significant positive effects on our interpersonal relationships … The pre-frontal cortex is where neurons are activated and when our secure love grows, the prefrontal fibres in our brains extend to other parts of the brain. This process is called pre-frontal integration and has been proved scientifically to be the foundation of well-being and happiness in people.
Hence we know that strong relationships, filled with empathy, resilience and attunement are effectively grown from the pre-frontal cortex of the brain. Interestingly, it is also this part of the brain that is activated through mindfulness …. when we learn to be in attuned adult relationships, we physically start to rewire our brains to create more joy in our lives”.
(Odyssey Magazine, 2013)

Several studies demonstrate that emotional disclosure can produce significantly enhanced health functioning”. (Tugade, M et al. 2004) The Johari (Joe Luft and Harry Ingham) Window is a model of giving and receiving feedback and disclosure in order to open the window to our understanding of self and others. Asking and telling. Sharing stories. Learning about how others see us. (Luft, J. 1984)



Richard Rohr is always spot on: “Nonviolence training has understandably emphasized largely external methods or ways of acting and resisting. These are important and necessary, but we must go even deeper. Unless those methods finally reflect inner attitudes, they will not make a lasting difference. We all have to admit that our secret thoughts are often cruel, attacking, judgmental, and harsh. The ego seems to find its energy precisely by having something to oppose, fix, or change. When the mind can judge something to be inferior, we feel superior. We must recognize our constant tendency toward negating reality, resisting it, opposing it, and attacking it in our minds. This is the universal addiction” (Rohr, R. 2019).

So the simple informal, collaborative engagement mechanism that I advocate is rich in opportunity for relationship repair and improvement, personal growth, building of trust, bonding … and this is reinforced as task performance and relationships reach new heights, and as has been often reported, leads to greater productivity and quality outputs.

An African greeting, sawubona means “I see you”, and an African response sikhona means “we are here”.  This encapsulates Martin Buber’s I-Thou oneness. Is a social contract every time two people meet.
“Towards you I
Moved out of myself
Out of my way
To stretch myself
To reach out to you”.   (Mphutlane Wa Bofelo)

It is like taking an empathy walk in the office or factory!


©Graham Williams 2019



References
Luft, Joseph Group Processes: an introduction to group dynamics (3rd edition) Mayfield Publishing Company 1984

Odyssey Magazine Mindfulness in Relationship http://www.odysseymagazine.co.za/
index.php/articles/34-general/654-mindfulness-in-relationship.html September 2013 citing Dan Siegel

Real, Terry  (2015)    The Relationship Grid: 4 quadrants for creating healthy relationships New Rules for Couples

Rohr, Richard  (2019) Love Is Our Nature  Center for Action and Contemplation 15th September, 2019

Rosenberg, Marshall B.  (2003) Nonviolent Communication: A Language of Life PuddleDancer Press

Tugade, Michele M; Fredrickson, Barbara L and Barrett, Lisa Feldman (2004) Psychological Resilience and Positive Emotional Granularity: Examining the Benefits of Positive Emotions on Coping and Health PMC US National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health. December, 2004

Williams, Graham & Kennedy, Justin (2019) The Psychologically Safe Imperative: applaud employees for speaking out
To be published September, 2019 in http://www.kr.co.za/human-capital-review

Saturday, August 31, 2019

REFRAMING FALSE STORIES: thanking Leroy Little Bear


by Mike Bonifer


In a presentation he gave at the Quantum Storytelling Conference in Las Cruces, NM, in 2013, Leroy Little Bear, an elder in the Blackfeet Nation in Alberta, Canada, and founding director of the Native American Studies program at Harvard, taught me about a big difference between indigenous peoples' stories and what he calls 'Western' storytelling. 

He did it simply, using a whiteboard in a classroom at New Mexico State University where he gave his talk.

"In the Western mind," he said, "stories live in time. That means a lie..." 

He drew a small 'x' on the whiteboard.

"...told at one point in time, will disappear over time." 

He drew a line the length of his arm, tipped it with an arrow, and added a '0' at the end of the arrow.




"In the Western mind, a lie told today will be of no significance two years from now. The lie, and all stories, disappear with time. 

Then he drew a square on the whiteboard. 
"In the indigenous mind, stories live in place."
He drew a small 'x' inside the box.
"A lie told in a place lives in that place. Will never leave that place. That means anyone visiting that place, for the rest of time, will be visited and affected by that lie, and by all the stories that happened there. The stories do not go away with time. They stay. They live in place." 





In American culture, we see the Western storytelling model in time-eroded and covered-up historical narratives of the indigenous tribes, slave labor, and capital markets, where money has a time value and time has a money value, and so acceleration and time/timing of transactions takes precedence over what the transaction is or does to its actors. 


We see the clash of Western and indigenous story frames in the 2016 protest at the Standing Rock reservation, where a linear, time-based narrative of capital investment and extraction (the pipeline), cut through a palimpsest of 'stories living in the land,' like a scalpel opening a body without any intention of healing it.

Closer to home and today, a man I have done business with over the years made me a promise in 2004 that he has not kept. In exchange for equity in a company the two of us launched, I told him if it was successful, I'd like it to pay for my children's college educations. He agreed. I got no equity. To date, the dude (of course it was a dude. a white dude.) has probably made $30 million personally from that company and what has spun out of it. He is a founder of a venture capital fund. Owns a virtual reality company. Is personal friends with Al Gore and Meg Ryan and Bono. Bought a second home in Aspen and completely remodeled it. Flies private jets. Bought an immersive theater company. Has screening rooms in all his houses. Drives a high-end Tesla. Me? I owe $164,000 on student loans I took out based on a handshake with the dude 15 years ago. Stupid, yes? Where was Leroy Little Bear when I needed him? Even before I knew of it, I was operating with an indigenous mindset, and the dude with whom I'd launched the company was operating 100% in Western mode. The man with the millions counted on the promise he made to me going away, and for the most part, it has. He has put enough time between him and the promise that it is invisible to anyone but the two of us. Is there a contract? No there is not. Do I have legal recourse? Not that I can afford. 

Meanwhile, the time pressure on servicing the student loan grows. The burden of carrying it weighs heavier by the week. Ticking clocks are a Western story trope. As the promise dissipates, greed fills the vacuum. The unchecked capitalist fever--of acquisition, extraction, exploitation, consumption, status, self-orientation--builds, with no regard to the land or its people. With no concerns of equitable allocations, or of win-win games. Only stakeholder optimization in win-lose scenarios. 

Typically, in Western stories, promises are made to be broken, and broken badly--or what's the point? Typically, in Western stories, there are winners and losers, or what's the point? It's why there's a famous saying in Hollywood, "It's not enough that I succeed. Everyone else must fail." To a totally Westernized mind, the man with the millions is the winner and I am the loser in this story.

Thanks in no small way to Leroy Little Bear and others, including Joseph Gladstone, David
Boje, Gregory Cajete and Grace Ann Rosile - elders in our tribe of storytellers who hold deep understanding of indigenous stories, and have roots in Blackfeet, Navajo, Nez Perce and Hopi cultures - I now have better framing and language for the scenario I have described here, as I've experienced it.

The white dude who's made millions? I see him not as a winner (his version of our story) or a villain (in my linear telling of it) but as a Coyote character in it. A mythic trickster. He comes from somewhere (in the white dude's case, he comes from Indiana, same as me) and is going no place in particular. As Coyote his motive has never been to hurt me or my family. He is without motive. He is pure opportunist. What he says and does can have malicious outcomes, but is not said or done with malicious intent. He does it to stir things up. To prompt questions. To provoke thoughts and actions.

There is no beginning, middle, or end, to our story. For over 20 years, Coyote has come and gone in my life at odd intervals, each time to and from a place where the promise re-visits us. A party. A phone call. A meal. A visit. Coyote knows he made a promise. His intention in returning to a place is not to make good on his promise, it's to make another promise that will be broken all over all over again. This is his trick. 

A week ago, Coyote showed up again, with another promise. He phoned and told me (excitedly! - he is always excited when he arrives, inevitably in a hurry but going nowhere in particular) that he would introduce me to a high status person. A New York Times best-selling author, an expert on entrepreneurship, whose organization has billions to invest. This is the Crow in our story. The character who can see to the far horizon. Can see the curves of land and spirals of time. Coyote tells me that how I tell stories can help Crow realize his vision of visiting far horizons. 

Coyote says his Russian Assistant will set up a phone call with the Crow, him, and me, in Coyote's office the following week. 

The meeting does not happen. Instead, Coyote emails me an introduction to a small non-profit with a wobbly business model - in our story this is a Flock of Geese, who honk a lot, but do not make sense.   

I tell Coyote this is not what was promised. I tell him conversations with Geese are useless. That he promised a meeting with Crow.

"Crow left his company," he says. "It was a surprise." 

This morning I called Crow's company, and asked if he still worked there. The person who answered the phone said yes, Crow is here. 

I text Coyote: Crow has not left his company. He is still there. Please make the intro.

Coyote forwards me an email he received from Crow, announcing that he will be leaving his company at the end of the year. Four and a half months from now. 

In the Western way, the white dude has time-shifted his story to justify his behavior and ease his conscience, and he gaslights me in the process. What was true yesterday is not true today. What is not true today will be true four and a half months from now. It's a shell game. Pacification. Stalling. It is the same strategy that pipeline companies use to run their construction through native soil without accounting for the ancestral stories living in the land. A Westernized telling of our story counts on time to do its work. Over time, the 'x' of a promise, will become a zero, a statement hollowed of all meaning. Empty. Distant. Forgotten. Or at least plausibly deniable. 

When, by comparison, I frame our story as indigenous--as a story living in place--I experience it in a different way. As non-linear. I experience it as the comings-and-goings of a Coyote who makes promises without intent, malicious or otherwise. I can understand that Coyote and I keep bumping into each other on our life's journey because our stories are forever entangled. I can appreciate that the positives and negatives of our 20-year relationship co-exist simultaneously, undiminished by time. I can see that this is why I am still in conversation with the man. Not because I will ever see a check for $164,000. No chance of that. Coyote never makes promises in order to keep them. Nor does he make them in order to break them. He makes them because they seem like an interesting thing to say. He knows something will come of them, and neither he, nor anyone else, knows what. (Think of what Coyote might have stirred up at Crow's company by sharing news that Crow will be flying in four and a half months.) 
What comes of a promise made by a trickster is not up to the trickster, but up to me.  When I frame our story as indigenous, I understand that what will happen in the four and a half months between today and the day Crow flies from his current perch, is not Coyote's to determine. The choices I make, the path I walk from here, will shape the future as I experience it. 

When I frame our story as indigenous, I can be entertained by it. I can laugh. I can write this. 

And as I write this, my friend Shannon Lee is currently caught up in a very public clash between Western and indigenous ways of experiencing a story. Shannon's father, the legendary martial artist and movie star, Bruce Lee, is depicted (by actor Mike Moh) in the writer/director Quentin Tarantino's new film, Once Upon a Time in Hollywood. There's a fight scene in the film involving a fictionalized version of Bruce Lee that no more resembles the real Bruce Lee than a toy action figure in a child's sandbox. Says Shannon, in an interview for the entertainment news site, The Wrap. “She added: ‘I understand they want to make the Brad Pitt character this super bad-ass who could beat up Bruce Lee. But they didn’t need to treat him in the way that white Hollywood did when he was alive.’” (Molloy, T. 2019)
The hokey story treatment to which Shannon alludes includes having the make-believe Bruce Lee refer to the boxer Muhammed Ali as ‘Cassius Clay’ which Ali always called his ‘slave name.’ Ali changed his name from Cassius Clay to Muhammed Ali in 1964. Once Upon a Time In Hollywood is set in 1969. Because Westernized stories are tied to time, the distance in time makes the fiction more palatable to a Western mind. The story takes place 50 years ago. What difference to a Western mind does a five-year gap fifty years ago make? In this framing, Tarantino’s fiction is only off by 10%. “90% accurate!” is what I imagine the studio spin on Tarantino’s depiction of Bruce Lee would be.
For Shannon Lee, for many masters teaching today in the dojo, and millions of lifelong fans of her father, the legend of Bruce Lee lives, not in time, as a Western storyteller like Tarantino would have it, but in place, fully present, as a philosophy, a way of life. 
Shannon herself oversees Bruce Lee Enterprises. Her work is keeping her father’s story alive, not as cartoony fictions, but in ways that are as alive and relevant today as they ever were. That Tarantino scripted Bruce Lee referring to Muhammed Ali by his slave name five years after he’d changed it is a weak sauce cooked up by a storyteller who wants to extract value from Bruce Lee’s story without participating authentically in it. This is a story approach I imagine would sound familiar to the Dakota and Lakota people of the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe, and all other North American indigenous tribes too.
My father worshipped Muhammed Ali,” says Shannon Lee. 


Thank you, Leroy Little Bear, for showing me a way.






Molloy, Tim (2019) Bruce Lee’s Daughter Saddened by ‘Mockery’ in ‘Once Upon a Time … in Hollywood’ (Exclusive)   The Wrap.  July 29, 2019





 Mike Bonifer is the founder of  


    

, a global network of storytelling specialists, who combine art, business, technology and social responsibility. 

Their stories are informed by cutting edge research on how and why stories emerge in networks, influence behaviors and are likely to shape the future. 
This work helps their client companies create more meaningful and rewarding relationships with their employees, partners and customers.

mike@bigstory.biz